Similar Posts

One Comment

  1. I think the reason so many parents go eclectic is because there’s so much more flexibility, and you can combine the strengths of each method. Every style, even Classical and Montessori, have to eventually draw in “standard” textbooks for certain subjects like math and eventually transition kids to being familiar with test/answer-based curriculum so they can succeed in college. Lesson packages also alleviate a lot of creative demand on the parent and ensure that there are no big “gaps” in educational topics.

    Eclectic combos also compensate for weaknesses in the systems. For example, literature-based learning is rather deficient in subjects like science and engineering, especially in grade school. There’s a lot of emphasis on bugs and farm animals but almost no astronomy, anatomy, microscope work, physics, chemistry, paleontology, or engineering in the junior grades. And Classical (in the form it is frequently implemented) is very strong on memorization without comprehension in the earliest grades – a structure in which “big-picture” conceptual children will struggle to thrive.

    But, textbooks by themselves are no fun without frequent diversion into art projects, nature treks, science experiments, history museums, and literature companion books. A history textbook chapter on pioneers is much more memorable when complemented by a museum tour, a literature reader like Laura Ingalls, and perhaps a leatherworking practicum or 3D sod house clay model. So it is just so much more well-rounded and fun to use a traditional textbook base spiced up with a plentiful assortment of Charlotte-Mason/Montessori/Classical combo of companion literature and activities. After all, who says we have to choose? 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.